Recent study reveals a dynamic web of social interactions in a hybrid quail population.
In Southern California, Gambel’s Quail (Callipepla gambelii) and California Quail (C. californica) come into contact and interbreed. This hybrid zone has been extensively described from a morphological, behavioral and genetic perspective by Jennifer Gee in the early 2000s (see the Galliformes page for more details). Recently, David Zonana and his colleagues – including Jennifer Gee – provided another perspective on this hybrid zone by applying a social network approach. Using radio-frequency identification tags, they managed to obtain a detailed picture of the social interactions between individual birds. I have covered the results from a previous study in another blog post. The final paragraph of that post nicely summarizes the main findings:
Quails pair up with individuals that share particular plumage patterns with them. Outside the contact zone, this strategy works perfectly because they only encounter members of their own species. In the contact zone, however, they run into quails from another species. But instead of focusing in the species-specific differences, they keep using the shared plumage traits to pick their partner. And voila, hybrids!
A new study in the Journal of Animal Ecology builds on these results by adding another layer of complexity: genetics. What do these social interactions mean for patterns of gene flow? Do quails with similar genetic ancestry flock together or do they ignore relatives to avoid inbreeding?
Using genomic data, the researchers calculated the percentage of shared genetic ancestry between individual birds and incorporated this information in the network analyses. It turned out that social associations were structured randomly with respect to genetic ancestry in all networks. They concluded that these random patterns of assortment “provide further evidence that behavioral reproductive isolation is likely weak within the hybrid zone.”
However, the genetic data uncovered some hidden patterns in the social network. The genetic parentage analyses revealed offspring from three pairs that were not strongly connected within the networks. These offspring might be the outcome of extra-pair copulations that can happen quickly (and are thus not picked up by the radio tags). Such extra-pair copulations can affect the direction of gene flow between hybridizing species. Whether this is the case in Gambel’s and California Quail remains to be investigated.
In addition to the genetic analyses, the researchers also studied the change in network structure over time. The rewiring of a network can occurs in two main ways: (1) changes in relationships or (2) changes in members of the network. The first way occurs when individuals associate with different birds at different times during the year, while the second way concerns members leaving (e.g., through migration or death) or new members joining the network. With regard to the quails, the rewiring of the network primarily involved changes in relationships between different members. It seems that there is a core breeding population with relatively stable membership but highly dynamic patterns of association.
Most social networks are thus a snapshot in time and can change dramatically throughout the year. This insight has important consequences for the study of hybrid zones, where mating is often considered random. However, changing social interactions can affect mating opportunities and potentially the incidence of hybridization. These dynamics will obviously differ between different hybrid zones, but need to be taken into account. More social network studies in hybrid zones, please.
Zonana, D. M., Gee, J. M., Breed, M. D., & Doak, D. F. (2021). Dynamic shifts in social network structure and composition within a breeding hybrid population. Journal of Animal Ecology, 90(1), 197-211.
Featured image: A Gambel’s Quail (Callipepla gambelii) © Alan D. Wilson | NaturesPicsOnline
This paper has been added to the Galliformes page.